Anticipating the good, the bad, and the ugly: An early warning approach to conflict and instability analysis

50Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One way to demonstrate progress in a field of scientific inquiry is to show that factors believed to explain some phenomenon can also be used effectively to predict both its occurrence and its nonoccurrence. This study draws on the state strength literature to identify relevant country macrostructural factors that can contribute to different kinds and levels of intensity of conflict and country instabilities. A pattern classification algorithm - fuzzy analysis of statistical evidence (FASE) - is used to analyze the relationships between country macrostructural factors and historical instances of country instability. A split-sample validation design is used to evaluate the ability of FASE to generate competent predictions, using the standard forecasting performance metrics overall accuracy, recall, and precision. The results demonstrate the potential for FASE to accurately forecast not just the occurrence but also the level of intensity of country-specific instabilities out 5 years with about 80% overall accuracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Brien, S. P. (2002). Anticipating the good, the bad, and the ugly: An early warning approach to conflict and instability analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(6), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200202237929

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free