Stability and outcomes of common property institutions in forestry: Evidence from the Terai region of Nepal

83Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the conditions for success of local common property institutions in forestry. The analysis is based on a case study of the Terai (lowlands) region of Nepal. Common property institutions were found to be stable despite the presence of inequality, ethnic heterogeneity, and migration into the region. This is due to the fact that these institutions build upon established systems of authority in the villages, include monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, and benefit from a supportive legal environment. As far as outcomes are concerned, common property serves well to protect forests locally; however, many village residents resort to exploiting forests managed under state property. The impact of common property on poverty alleviation is ambiguous. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chakraborty, R. N. (2001). Stability and outcomes of common property institutions in forestry: Evidence from the Terai region of Nepal. Ecological Economics, 36(2), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00237-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free