Abstract
This literature review describes web indicators for the impact of books, software, datasets, videos and other non-standard academic outputs. Although journal articles dominate academic research in the health and natural sciences, other types of outputs can make equally valuable contributions to scholarship and are more common in other fields. It is not always possible to get useful citation-based impact indicators for these due to their absence from, or incomplete coverage in, traditional citation indexes. In this context, the web is particularly valuable as a potential source of impact indicators for non-standard academic outputs. The main focus in this review is on books because of the much greater amount of relevant research for them and because they are regarded as particularly valuable in the arts and humanities and in some areas of the social sciences.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2015, November 1). Web indicators for research evaluatio n. Part 3: Books and nonsta ndard outputs. Profesional de La Informacion. El Profesional de la Informacion. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.nov.04
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.