Antinomi Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang

  • Muhammad Taufiq Hafid
  • Willy Talentaniko
  • Yudi Pratama Tanjung
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Government Regulation a Substitute for laws (Perppu) is president right to regulate something in terms of compelling urgency. Perppu issued by the president must be immediately determined by the House of Representatives to be declared rejected or accepted. Article 24C Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945 stipulates that authority of Constitutional Court is to only examine the law against Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945, not the Perppu. However, Constitutional Court through decision No. 138/PUU-VII/ 2009 states that the Constitutional Court has authority to examine  Perppu against  Constitution of Republic Indonesia 1945. The Perppu made by president make a new of legal norms that give rise to new legal status, new legal relationships and new legal consequences. Constitutional Court interprets that norms contained in Perppu are as binding as norms in the law. In conducting tests, Constitutional Court does not distinguish between formal and material laws.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muhammad Taufiq Hafid, Willy Talentaniko, & Yudi Pratama Tanjung. (2020). Antinomi Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang. Amsir Law Journal, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v2i1.27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free