Between history and philosophy of science: The relationship between Kuhn's black-body theory and structure

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thomas Kuhn’s bookBlack-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity has come to be seen as something like the odd man out among his oeuvre. In particular, while the book has undoubtedly made a significant impact on the historiography of the discovery of the quantum, reconstructive accounts of Kuhn’s philosophy of science have generally paid little attention to Black-Body Theory. This is a lacuna I will attempt to rectify in part in this article. I will argue that Black-Body Theory raises a number of interesting questions vis-à-vis Kuhn’s philosophy of science: specifically, that although Black-Body Theory can be said to partially mesh with the picture of science set forth in Structure, there are other parts of the account of the quantum revolution that fail to gel with the model of science set out in Structure. This leads to the question, Did Kuhn unwittingly undermine his philosophical account of science with the historical work undertaken in Black-Body Theory?.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Timmins, A. (2019). Between history and philosophy of science: The relationship between Kuhn’s black-body theory and structure. HOPOS, 9(2), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1086/704374

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free