¿A qué llamamos participar en democracia?: Diferencias y similitudes en las formas de participación

16Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to deliberate about the means and the context involved in individual's participation. For this respect, we make up two models about participation that we present regarding the political and cultural background bound to them. The first one is related to participation by institutionalized ways as such social organitations or direct contact with politicians, while the other one is related to participation by not regulated ways as such demonstrations, shopping boycott, that is, conventional and non conventional ways of participation. The aim is to know which features we can find being linked to both models to be able to think of citizenship participatory. Our analysis conclude that either conventional and non conventional ways of participation are reciprocal, so they reinforced each other, although it stress on that the non conventional participation support, better than the first one, the civic values we can expect from participation and democracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández, E. G., & García, F. J. F. (2008). ¿A qué llamamos participar en democracia?: Diferencias y similitudes en las formas de participación. Revista Internacional de Sociologia, 66(49), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.i49.84

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free