Are any public-reported earthquake precursors valid?

13Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines retrospective public-supplied precursor reports statistically, and confirms published hypotheses that some alleged precursors within 100 km and within a day prior to the large 1995 Kobe and 1999 Izmit earthquakes, may be valid. The confirmations are mostly at the p<0.001 level of significance. Most significant were alleged meteorological and geophysical precursors, and less often, animal reports. The chi-squared test used, for the first time eliminates the distorting effects of psychological factors on the reports. However it also shows that correct reports are diluted with about the same number which are merely wishful thinking, and obtaining more reliable data would be logistically difficult. Some support is found for another published hypothesis in which other precursors occurred within the ten days prior to the earthquake. © European Geosciences Union 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whitehead, N. E., Ulusoy, U., Asahara, H., & Ikeya, M. (2004). Are any public-reported earthquake precursors valid? Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 4(3), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-463-2004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free