The Effects of Different Intraoral Scanners, Scan Levels and Splinting Techniques on the Accuracy of Digital Impressions: An In Vitro Study

Abstract

Featured Application: This study investigates the effects of different intraoral scanners, scanning levels, and splinting methods on the trueness and precision of digital impressions in All-on-Four implant treatments. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive technical understanding of digital impression workflows and support the development of better-fitting implant-supported restorations, thereby providing a scientific basis for future clinical applications. The accuracy of digital impressions in fully edentulous cases is limited by the lack of anatomical reference structures, potentially affecting passive fit. The effects of scanner type, impression level, and scan body splinting on accuracy remain insufficiently elucidated. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of different intraoral scanners, scanning levels, and scan body splinting methods on digital impression accuracy. A fully edentulous mandibular model with four implants (All-on-4) was fabricated, and scan bodies were connected at either the implant or multi-unit abutment level. Five splinting methods (nonsplinted, floss, orthodontic elastomeric, chain attachments, and single attachments) were applied, creating 10 experimental groups. Each group was scanned using three intraoral scanners: iTero Lumina (Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), TRIOS 3 (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), and Medit i700 (Medit Corp, Seoul, Republic of Korea), with four repeated scans per scanner (120 scans total). Trueness and precision were assessed based on linear and angular deviations using Geomagic Control X (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA). Scanner type and scanning level significantly affected accuracy (p < 0.05), with TRIOS 3 showing higher deviations, while multi-unit abutments reduced deviations. Splinting methods showed no significant effect on accuracy, and precision did not differ among groups. Scanner type and scanning level significantly influenced digital impression accuracy; however, splinting methods yielded no significant effect. Precision remained comparable among groups.