Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Medical Disputes Within Sharia-Compliant Hospitals: The Role of Good Faith in Balancing Patient Justice and Professional Protection

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The expansion of Sharia-compliant hospitals in Indonesia requires a context-specific mechanism for resolving medical disputes. Law No. 17 of 2023 mandates Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including arbitration, that aligns with Islamic legal principles—particularly good faith. This principle, rooted in sincerity, fairness, and respect, underpins Islamic jurisprudence and ensures ethical dispute resolution. This study proposes an ADR framework, specifically arbitration, for Sharia-compliant hospitals grounded in good-faith principles that safeguard patients’ rights while protecting healthcare professionals from unjust claims. Integrating values such as niyyah (sincere intent), Sidq (honesty), adl (justice), huqūq (respect for rights), amānah (responsibility), and avoidance of darar (harm) fosters trust, fairness, and accountability, thereby sustaining an ethical healthcare environment responsive to both patient welfare and practitioner integrity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herliana, & Nugrahenti, M. C. (2025). Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Medical Disputes Within Sharia-Compliant Hospitals: The Role of Good Faith in Balancing Patient Justice and Professional Protection. Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 24(2), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v24i2.10308

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free