Different impact of long-detection interval and anti-tachycardia pacing in reducing unnecessary shocks: Data from the ADVANCE III trial

45Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims A long-detection interval (LDI) (30/40 intervals) has been proved to be superior to a standard-detection interval (SDI) (18/24 intervals) in terms of reducing unnecessary implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. To better evaluate the different impact of LDI and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) on reducing painful shocks, we assessed all treated episodes in the ADVANCE III trial. Methods and results A total of 452 fast (200 ms < 0.001)]. The efficacy of ATP in terminating FVT was 63% in SDI and 52% in LDI (P = 0.022). No difference in the safety profile (acceleration/degeneration and death/cardiovascular hospitalizations) was observed between the two groups. Conclusion The combination of LDI and ATP during charging is extremely effective and significantly reduces appropriate but unnecessary therapies. The use of LDI alone yielded a 39% reduction in appropriate but unnecessary therapies; ATP on top of LDI determined another 52% reduction in unnecessary shocks. The strategy of associating ATP and LDI could be considered in the majority of ICD recipients.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arenal, A., Proclemer, A., Kloppe, A., Lunati, M., Martìnez Ferrer, J. B., Hersi, A., … Gasparini, M. (2016). Different impact of long-detection interval and anti-tachycardia pacing in reducing unnecessary shocks: Data from the ADVANCE III trial. Europace, 18(11), 1719–1725. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free