Comparison of two different modes for noninvasive mechanical ventilation in chronic respiratory failure: Volume versus pressure controlled device

129Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The most commonly used mode of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NMV) is volume-controlled intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). Pressure support ventilation has recently become increasingly popular, but its merits have not been clearly defined. In an open, nonrandomized follow-up study, we evaluated two modes of NMV, volume-controlled (IPPV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) over 6 months in 30 consecutive patients (24 males and 6 females, aged 49 ± 19 yrs) with chronic respiratory failure (CRF). The baseline assessments comprised both physiological and subjective data. In all cases, nasal IPPV was initially administered for 1 month, followed by a second month of nasal PCV. Thereafter, responders or nonresponders to PCV were defined according to the patients' subjective symptom score and/or the recurrence of hypercapnia. During the IPPV phase, in all but two patients the subjective and objective parameters improved significantly. During the following 1 month PCV phase, stabilization was maintained in 18 patients ('responders'), while 10 patients were defined as 'nonresponders'. In nonresponders, hypercapnia increased (arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2): 5.7 ± 0.4 to 6.6 ± 0.5 kPa; p < 0.05) and symptom scores decreased. Compared with responders, nonresponders had a lower mean nocturnal arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) (p < 0.05) and a higher daytime Ps,CO2 (p < 0.05) at baseline. We conclude that the majority of patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure who are initially satisfactorily ventilated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation may also be adequately maintained with pressure-controlled ventilation. However, there is a subgroup with more severe chronic respiratory failure at baseline, in whom pressure-controlled ventilation is inadequate. After 4 weeks of treatment with pressure-controlled ventilation, the subjective scores and the arterial carbon dioxide tension values reliably distinguished between long-term responders and nonresponders to pressure-controlled ventilation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schönhofer, B., Sonneborn, M., Haidl, P., Böhrer, H., & Köhler, D. (1997). Comparison of two different modes for noninvasive mechanical ventilation in chronic respiratory failure: Volume versus pressure controlled device. European Respiratory Journal, 10(1), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.97.10010184

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free