Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease

69Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Borrelia burgdorferi was discovered to be the cause of Lyme disease in 1983, leading to seroassays. The 1994 serodiagnostic testing guidelines predated a full understanding of key B. burgdorferi antigens and have a number of shortcomings. These serologic tests cannot distinguish active infection, past infection, or reinfection. Reliable direct-detection methods for active B. burgdorferi infection have been lacking in the past but are needed and appear achievable. New approaches have effectively been applied to other emerging infections and show promise in direct detection of B. burgdorferi infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schutzer, S. E., Body, B. A., Boyle, J., Branson, B. M., Dattwyler, R. J., Fikrig, E., … Branda, J. A. (2019, March 5). Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy614

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free