Creativity at the Crossroads: Pragmatic Versus Humanist Claims in Education Reform Speeches

15Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Obama's, and other policymakers', speeches claim that creativity-the ability to derive novel, excellent and relevant ideas and products-is a valuable student asset for the 21st century, but why? Two types of rhetorical appeals to long-held educational values in these speeches are examined: pragmatic claims about student creativity focus on economic recovery, which implies a need to teach and research the link between creativity, academic success and workforce preparation. In contrast, humanist claims about student creativity emphasize a teaching and research agenda of promoting self-realization, cultural identity formation, and aesthetic learning principles, which include empathy and emotional awareness in addition to cognitive aspects of creative thinking and problem solving. These rhetorical appeals are examined in light of education reform and directions in art education. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2012). Creativity at the Crossroads: Pragmatic Versus Humanist Claims in Education Reform Speeches. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.726574

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free