The relation between heat strain and hydration status in the food industry employees in Mashhad, 2014

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: During physical activity in hot environments, sweating along with evaporation is increased, as the most important physiological response, which can lead to dehydration. Especially those who participate in physical activity in warm environments. Aim: The aim of this study was the determination of heat stress and its risk assessment and investigates in dehydration conditions of workers in hot workplaces. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study was done on 90 workers in the food industry. Heart rate and oral temperature were respectively measured using a heart rate meter and an oral thermometer. The WBGT index was recorded and the HSSI questionnaire was completed simultaneously, in order to assess the dehydration level was measured of refract meter. Data obtained from this study were analyzed using compare means and t-test, paired t-test tests with SPSS 20 software. Results and discussion: Heat stress exceeded the national and international recommended limits based on the WBGT index in 44% of cases of workstations. According to this study, 8.5% of our population had some degree of dehydration; 63.4% of them were significantly dehydrated (urine SG > 1020) and 28% of them were severely dehydrated (urine SG>1030). The correlations between heat strains, urine density and heat stress, including oral temperature, heart rate were significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: High percentage of our population was dehydrated. On the basis of results of this study, heat stress condition was worrying. It seems that planning in order to control of heat stresses by replacing drinking is necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolghanabadi, S., Mohammadi, A., Kohnavard, B., & Delkhosh, M. (2019). The relation between heat strain and hydration status in the food industry employees in Mashhad, 2014. Polish Annals of Medicine, 26(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.29089/2017.17.00040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free