Power-law versus log-law in wall-bounded turbulence: A large-eddy simulation perspective

9Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The debate whether the mean streamwise velocity in wall-bounded turbulent flows obeys a log-law or a power-law scaling originated over two decades ago, and continues to ferment in recent years. As experiments and direct numerical simulation can not provide sufficient clues, in this study we present an insight into this debate from a large-eddy simulation (LES) viewpoint. The LES organically combines state-of-the-art models (the stretched-vortex model and inflow rescaling method) with a virtual-wall model derived under different scaling law assumptions (the loglaw or the power-law by George and Castillo ["Zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer," Appl. Mech. Rev. 50, 689 (1997)]). Comparison of LES results for ReΘ ranging from 105 to 1011 for zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flows are carried out for the mean streamwise velocity, its gradient and its scaled gradient. Our results provide strong evidence that for both sets of modeling assumption (log law or power law), the turbulence gravitates naturally towards the log-law scaling at extremely large Reynolds numbers. © 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, W., & Samtaney, R. (2014). Power-law versus log-law in wall-bounded turbulence: A large-eddy simulation perspective. Physics of Fluids, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4862919

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free