Exposure to pro-smoking media in college students: Does type of media channel differentially contribute to smoking risk?

18Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There are almost no data on whether the different channels through which pro-smoking media appear (i.e., point-of-sale advertising, movie smoking) differently influence smoking. Purpose: This study used ecological momentary assessment to examine whether differences in smoking risk were observed for exposures to different pro-smoking media channels. Methods: College students (n = 134) carried smartphones for 21 days, recording their exposures to pro-smoking media and the media channels for that exposure and responding to three randomly issued control prompts per day. Participants answered questions about their future smoking risk after each pro-smoking media exposure and random prompt. Results: Participants had elevated future smoking risk following exposure to pro-smoking media at point of sale (p < 0.001); smoking risk at times of exposure to smoking in movies did not differ from risk measured during control prompts (p = 0.78). Conclusions: There is merit to examining the relative contribution of different pro-smoking media channels to smoking behavior. © 2013 The Society of Behavioral Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shadel, W. G., Martino, S. C., Setodji, C., & Scharf, D. (2013). Exposure to pro-smoking media in college students: Does type of media channel differentially contribute to smoking risk? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(3), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9461-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free