Toward a resilient and smart supply chain: identifying and prioritizing barriers to metaverse adoption

13Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose – The adoption of the metaverse in supply chain management (SCM) presents transformative potential to address inefficiencies such as real-time visibility gaps, demand forecasting inaccuracies and stakeholder collaboration challenges. However, its adoption is hindered by multifaceted barriers that remain underexplored in the literature. This study systematically identifies, analyses and prioritizes 12 critical barriers to metaverse adoption in SCM. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses an integrated methodology that merges a qualitative literature review with quantitative techniques, including “Interpretive Structural Modelling” (ISM) and “Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification” (MICMAC) analysis. Findings – Key findings reveal that foundational barriers such as lack of standards and lack of infrastructure occupy the highest level in the ISM hierarchy, exerting significant influence over dependent barriers like real-time data integration and stakeholder collaboration. MICMAC analysis further classifies barriers into autonomous independent linkage and dependent categories, highlighting their dynamic interdependencies. Originality/value – The study underscores the need for holistic strategies emphasizing technological readiness and ecosystem alignment to facilitate metaverse adoption. By offering a hierarchical framework and actionable insights, this study contributes to both academic discourse and practical implementation, aiding organizations in analysing the difficulties of metaverse integration for resilient, efficient and sustainable SCM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Adwan, A. S., & Abdeljaber, O. (2025). Toward a resilient and smart supply chain: identifying and prioritizing barriers to metaverse adoption. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIEOM-06-2025-0113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free