Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening in Korea, 2005–2015: After the introduction of the national cancer screening program

7Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate inequalities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in Korea and trends therein using the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) across income and education groups. Materials and Methods: Data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annually conducted, nationwide cross-sectional survey, were utilized. A total of 17174 men and women aged 50 to 74 years were included for analysis. Prior experience with CRC screening was defined as having either a fecal occult blood test within the past year or a lifetime colonoscopy. CRC screening rates and annual percentage changes (APCs) were evaluated. Then, SII and RII were calculated to assess inequality in CRC screening for each survey year. Results: CRC screening rates increased from 23.4% in 2005 to 50.9% in 2015 (APC, 7.8%; 95% CI, 6.0 to 9.6). Upward trends in CRC screening rates were observed for all age, education, and household income groups. Education inequalities were noted in 2009, 2014, and overall pooled estimates in both indices. Income inequalities were inconsistent among survey years, and overall estimates did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Education inequalities in CRC screening among men and women aged 50 to 74 years were observed in Korea. No apparent pattern, however, was found for income inequalities. Further studies are needed to thoroughly outline socio-economic inequalities in CRC screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mai, T. T. X., Lee, Y. Y., Suh, M., Choi, E., Lee, E. Y., Ki, M., … Choi, K. S. (2018). Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening in Korea, 2005–2015: After the introduction of the national cancer screening program. Yonsei Medical Journal, 59(9), 1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.9.1034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free