Naming the Problem: Publishing Trends within in Urology on Race, Health Disparities and Structural Racism

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To assess publishing trends regarding the contribution of societal systems on health disparities within the urology literature. Methods: We performed a bibliometric analysis of the top 15 urology journals for titles and abstracts with the term race or ethnicity between 2000-2021. Articles were graded by the presence of (1) race, (2) disparities secondary to race, or (3) racial disparities secondary to structural biases. Frequencies were tabulated and logistic regression was used to determine odds of disparities publishing. Results: Our query returned 934 articles for review. In 484 (52%) articles, race was mentioned as a demographic/covariate. 110 (12%) abstracts noted a racial health disparity and only 2 articles implicated racism. Rates of more direct language varied significantly by journal and year of publication. Discussion of disparities increased over time, ranging from 0% in 2002 to 25% in 2020 (P-trend

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernstein, A. N., Talwar, R., Williams, C., Correa, A., & Mahal, B. (2022). Naming the Problem: Publishing Trends within in Urology on Race, Health Disparities and Structural Racism. Urology, 162, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free