Is prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 sufficiently discovering clinically significant prostate cancer? Per-lesion radiology-pathology correlation study

17Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of multiparametric MRI with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) for detecting prostate cancer (PCA) and clinically significant PCA through this per-lesion one-to-one correlation study between pathologically proven lesions and MRI-visible lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 93 PCA lesions from 44 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists scored every visible lesion with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3, 4, or 5 in each patient’s multiparametric MRI examination using PI-RADSv2. A per-lesion one-to-one correlation between MRI-visible lesions and pathologically confirmed PCA lesions was conducted during regular radiology-pathology meetings at our center. The detection rates of clinically significant PCA and the proportions of clinically significant PCAs from MRI-visible and MRI-invisible PCAs were calculated. The performance of PI-RADSv2 for detecting clinically significant PCA was evaluated using the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) value. RESULTS. Using a PI-RADSv2 score of 3, 4, or 5 as an MRI-visible lesion, 46.88% of clinically significant PCA lesions were detected. The PPV, NPV, and AUC were 96.77%, 45.16%, and 0.72, respectively. Tumor volume and secondary Gleason grade showed a statistically significant difference between MRI-visible and MRI-invisible clinically significant PCAs. CONCLUSION. Multiparametric MRI with PI-RADSv2 missed a considerable number of clinically significant PCA lesions in this per-lesion analysis, causing a relatively low NPV and diagnostic performance compared with previous per-patient studies. However, the high PPV indicates that multiparametric MRI with PI-RADSv2 may be useful for follow-up of active surveillance and planning focal therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, M. S., Moon, M. H., Kim, Y. A., Sung, C. K., Woo, H., Jeong, H., & Son, H. (2018). Is prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 sufficiently discovering clinically significant prostate cancer? Per-lesion radiology-pathology correlation study. American Journal of Roentgenology, 211(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free