Abstract
Objective: It was aimed to comparatively assess the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), biofeedback (BF), and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) treatments in overactive bladder (OAB) patients. Material and Methods: The patients presented to the urogynecology outpatient clinic between June 2017 and March 2018. They were randomly divided into Group 1: PFMT (n=31), Group 2: PFMT and BF (n=32), and Group 3: PFMT and TTNS (n=33). Patients who received anticholinergic therapy, those who had a previous incontinence surgery or had neurological diseases, those who were pregnant, those who were breastfeeding, those with abnormal liver-kidney functions, persistent urinary infection, or atrophic vaginitis, and those who did not agree to take part in the study were excluded. The OAB Questionnaire (OAB-V8), the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and the Female Sexual Function Index forms were filled out before and after the 12-week treatment. Results: Daytime and nighttime urinary frequency, total urinary incontinence, and pad test values were lower after the treatment compared to before in all three groups (p<0.001). A statistically significant decline was seen in post-treatment ICIQSF and OAB-V8 scores compared to pre treatment scores in all three groups (p<0.01). The decrease in daytime urinary frequency was seen to be statistically significant in Group 2, and the values in this group were lower compared to those in Groups 1 and 3 (p: 0.045, p: 0.014, respectively). Conclusion: The overall effectiveness of the conservative treatments was determined to be similar. In the selection process, conservative treatment methods should be personalized.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Keski̇N Paker, M., Uslu Yuvaci, H., Ünal, O., Kiliç, Y., Nas, K., Bostanci, M. S., … Akdemir, N. (2023). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training, Biofeedback, and Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 33(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2023-98743
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.