Disaggregating state fragility: a method to establish a multidimensional empirical typology

48Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This conceptual and methodological article makes the case for a multidimensional empirical typology of state fragility. It presents a framework that defines fragile statehood as deficiencies in one or more of the core functions of the state: authority, capacity and legitimacy. Unlike available indices of state fragility, it suggests a route towards operationalisation that maintains this multidimensionality. The methodology presented should help in future research to identify clusters of countries that exhibit similar constellations of statehood, whereby ‘constellation’ refers to the specific mix of characteristics across the three dimensions. Such an identification of empirical types would fulfil a demand that exists both in academic research and among policy circles for finding a more realistic model of fragility at an intermediate level between single-case analyses and the far-too-broad category of state fragility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grävingholt, J., Ziaja, S., & Kreibaum, M. (2015). Disaggregating state fragility: a method to establish a multidimensional empirical typology. Third World Quarterly, 36(7), 1281–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1038340

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free