Diagnostics and new treatment regimens for TB: can the Xpert MTB/XDR assay fill the gap for fluoroquinolone testing?

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rapid diagnosis of resistance-conferring mutations to antibiotics used for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) is critical for patient care and public health control efforts. Prior guidelines included the use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) for the treatment of drug-resistant TB, including multidrug-resistant TB, pre-extensively drug-resistant TB, and extensively drug-resistant TB. More recently, a short-course regimen for antibiotic-susceptible TB was introduced, which includes the use of a FQ, a drug class that diagnostic algorithms in the United States (US) typically do not test for if all first-line agents are susceptible. However, FQ mono-resistance has been documented by previous studies, and for this reason, we tested 319 archived Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains spanning a 14-year period of time using the Xpert MTB/XDR assay. Resistance to FQs was detected in 4.4% (14/319) of the isolates tested, with mutations predominating in the gyrA region (13/14; 92.9%). A single isolate (1/14; 7.1%) was found to have a gyrB mutation. A broth microdilution assay demonstrated the minimum inhibitory concentrations for resistant strains that ranged from 0.5 µg/mL to 8.0 µg/mL. Importantly, three strains were FQ mono-resistant and would have been completely missed by standard testing algorithms. Although currently unavailable in the US, the GeneXpert XDR assay has the potential to fill the significant diagnostic gap in susceptibility testing of MTBC resistance to FQs and support the use of the currently recommended short-course regimen.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armstrong, D. T., Baird, E. C. E., Pretty, L., D’Agostino, K., Schwartz, M., Campódonico, V. L., & Parrish, N. (2025). Diagnostics and new treatment regimens for TB: can the Xpert MTB/XDR assay fill the gap for fluoroquinolone testing? Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 63(10). https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00643-25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free