Proteomic analysis of experimentally induced azole resistance in Candida glabrata

57Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to identify changes in the proteome of a laboratory-derived azole-resistant strain of Candida glabrata compared with its susceptible parent strain in an effort to identify proteins that are differentially expressed in association with azole resistance. Methods: Soluble and membrane protein fractions were isolated from mutant strain F15 (fluconazole MIC > 128 mg/L) and parent strain 66032 (fluconazole MIC = 16 mg/L) grown to mid-log phase. Soluble proteins were resolved by both two-dimensional (2D) and one-dimensional (1D) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (GE) whereas membrane proteins were resolved by 1D GE. Spots or bands representing differentially expressed proteins were identified by matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF MS) and peptide mass fingerprinting. Results: A total of 22 proteins were found to be more abundantly represented, and 3 proteins were found to be less abundantly represented, in strain F15 compared with strain 66032. These included up-regulation of the ATP-binding cassette transporter Cdr1p, the ergosterol biosynthesis enzyme Erg11p, proteins involved in glycolysis and glycerol metabolism, and proteins involved in the response to oxidative stress and cadmium exposure. Conclusions: In addition to transcriptional regulation of Cdr1p, this study identified the differential expression of several proteins that may contribute to azole resistance and suggests the possibility for a post-transcriptional mechanism for increased expression of Erg11p. © 2006 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rogers, P. D., Vermitsky, J. P., Edlind, T. D., & Hilliard, G. M. (2006). Proteomic analysis of experimentally induced azole resistance in Candida glabrata. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 58(2), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free