Extracting subtask-specific metrics toward objective assessment of needle insertion skill for hemodialysis cannulation

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

About 80% of all in-hospital patients require vascular access cannulation for treatments. However, there is a high rate of failure for vascular access cannulation, with several studies estimating up to a 50% failure rate for these procedures. Hemodialysis cannulation (HDC) is arguably one of the most difficult of these procedures with a steep learning curve and an extremely high failure rate. In light of this, there is a critical need that clinicians performing HDC have requisite skills. In this work, we present a method that combines the strengths of simulator-based objective skill quantification and task segmentation for needle insertion skill assessment at the subtask level. The results from our experimental study with seven novice nursing students on the cannulation simulator demonstrate that the simulator was able to segment needle insertion into subtask phases. In addition, most metrics were significantly different between the two phases, indicating that there may be value in evaluating participants' behavior at the subtask level. Further, the outcome metric (risk of infiltrating the simulated blood vessel) was successfully predicted by the process metrics in both phases. The implications of these results for skill assessment and training are discussed, which could potentially lead to improved patient outcomes if more extensive validation is pursued.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Z., Liu, Z., & Singapogu, R. (2019). Extracting subtask-specific metrics toward objective assessment of needle insertion skill for hemodialysis cannulation. Journal of Medical Robotics Research, 4(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424905X19420066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free