Which is Superior, Doppler Velocimetry or Non-stress Test or Both in Predicting the Perinatal Outcome of High-Risk Pregnancies

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: To analyze which is superior, Doppler velocimetry or non-stress test or both by means of categorization into four groups and comparing the prediction of perinatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies like anemia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancies. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ISO KGH, Madras Medical College, Chennai, in the year 2014. Two hundred high-risk pregnancies like anemia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were included in the study. They were examined systematically, and Doppler velocimetry and non-stress test were done. The main vessels studied by Doppler were umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery, and the indices were calculated. The results of the non-stress test were interpreted as reactive and non-reactive. Based on the results of Doppler and non-stress test, the 200 cases were categorized into four groups and the results were analyzed. Results: Among the 200 cases of high-risk pregnancies, those with a normal Doppler study and a reactive non-stress test had good perinatal outcome. When both were abnormal, there was a higher percentage of adverse outcome as compared to that of either Doppler alone being abnormal or non-stress test alone being non-reactive. It was also found that abnormal Doppler but with a reactive non-stress test had the advantage of prolonging the pregnancy and bringing a better outcome indicating that non-stress test is surely a good test of well-being. When Doppler was normal, but non-stress test was non-reactive, there was an increase in the rate of cesarean section. Conclusion: Each method of fetal surveillance reflects different aspect of maternal and fetal pathophysiology. Hence, combining these will help to bring out better perinatal outcome.