Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from cattle farms in Washington State

105Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The prevalence of thermopfailic Campylobacter spp. was investigated in cattle on Washington State farms. A total of 350 thermophilic Campylobacter isolates were isolated from 686 cattle sampled on 15 farms (eight dairies, two calf rearer farms, two feedlots, and three beef cow-calf ranches). Isolate species were identified with a combination of phenotypic tests, hipO colony blot hybridization, and multiplex IpxA PCR. Breakpoint resistance to four antimicrobials (ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, erythromycin, and doxycycline) was determined by agar dilation. Campylobacter jejuni was the most freqiient species isolated (34.1%), followed by Campylobacter coli (7.7%) and other thermophilic campylobacters (1.5%). The most frequently detected resistance was to doxycycline (42.3% of 350 isolates). Isolates from calf rearer facilities were more frequently doxycycline resistant than isolates from other farm types. C. jejuni was most frequently susceptible to all four of the antimicrobial drugs studied (58.8% of 272 isolates). C. coli isolates were more frequently resistant than C. jejuni, including resistance to qiiinolone antimicrobials (89.3% of isolates obtained from calves on calf rearer farms) and to erythromycin (72.2% of isolates obtained from feedlot cattle). Multiple drug resistance was more frequent in C. coli (51.5%) than in C. jejuni (5.1%). The results of this study demonstrate that C. jejuni is widely distributed among Washington cattle farms, while C. coli is more narrowly distributed but significantly more resistant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bae, W., Kaya, K. N., Hancock, D. D., Call, D. R., Park, Y. H., & Besser, T. E. (2005). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from cattle farms in Washington State. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(1), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.1.169-174.2005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free