Impact of pre-existing fabrics and multi-phase oblique extension on Cenozoic fault patterns, Wichianburi sub-basin of the Phetchabun rift, Thailand

42Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cenozoic fault patterns associated with rift development in the Wichianburi Sub-Basin show a wide range of controls at different scales including influence by the margin of a Permian basin, and NW-SE to NE-SW trending Triassic folds and faults. During the Late Oligocene-Early Miocene phase 1 normal faults (NNW-SSE to NNE-SSW trends) developed in response to ∼ E-W extension. Faults predominantly trend NNW-SSE to N-S during this phase. During the Middle Miocene-Pliocene the extension direction rotated to a more NW-SE orientation. The old fault orientations were reactivated, and new faults also developed with predominantly NNE-SSW to NE-SW orientations. Many new faults nucleated within the syn-rift section and were not directly influenced by pre-existing fabrics in the pre-rift section. Four types of phase 2 fault can be identified: Type 1 = newly formed faults that strike sub-orthogonal to the phase 2 extension direction, Type 2 = newly formed faults that strike between the phase 1 fault orientations and Type 1 faults. Type 3 = newly formed faults that strike at angles greater than 90° with respect to the phase 2 extension direction. Type 4 = reactivated phase 1 faults. Local stress rotations, and fault linkage rotations explain many of the Type 2 and 3 fault orientations. The stress rotation in the Middle Miocene is observed in other basins in Central Thailand, notably the Suphan Buri and Phitsanulok Basins, where a range of fault patterns are produced by the effects of inherited fabrics plus multi-phase rifting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pongwapee, S., Morley, C. K., & Won-in, K. (2019). Impact of pre-existing fabrics and multi-phase oblique extension on Cenozoic fault patterns, Wichianburi sub-basin of the Phetchabun rift, Thailand. Journal of Structural Geology, 118, 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.11.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free