High-resolution air quality simulations of ozone exceedance events during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study

Abstract

We evaluate two high-resolution Lake Michigan air quality simulations during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study campaign. These air quality simulations employ identical chemical configurations but use different input meteorology. The AP-XM configuration follows the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-recommended modeling practices, whereas the YNT_SSNG employs different parameterization schemes and satellite-based inputs of sea surface temperatures, green vegetative fraction, and soil moisture and temperature. Overall, we find a similar performance in the model simulations of hourly and maximum daily average 8g€¯h (MDA8) ozone, with the AP-XM and YNT_SSNG simulations showing biases of -11.42 and -13.54g€¯ppbv (parts per billion by volume), respectively, during periods when the observed MDA8 was greater than 70g€¯ppbv. However, for the two monitoring sites that observed high-ozone events, the AP-XM simulation better matched observations at Chiwaukee Prairie, and the YNT_SSNG simulation better matched observations at the Sheboygan Kohler-Andrae (KA) State Park. We find that the differences between the two simulations are largest for column amounts of ozone precursors, particularly NO2. Across three high-ozone events, the YNT_SSNG simulation has a lower NO2 column bias (0.17×1015g€¯molg€¯cm-2) compared to the AP-XM simulation (0.31×1015g€¯molg€¯cm-2). The YNT_SSNG simulation also has an advantage in that it better captures the structure of the boundary layer and lake breeze during the 2 June high-ozone event, although the timing of the lake breeze is about 3g€¯h too early at Sheboygan. Our results are useful for informing an air quality modeling framework for the Lake Michigan area.