Best Practices in Family Life Education Program Evaluation

12Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Program evaluation should be integral to family life education (FLE), but program administrators face common barriers, including expense, lack of evaluation expertise, and fear of no-effects findings. Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide a primer on feasible best-practice guidelines for the evaluation of FLE programs. Specifically, we explore four best practices in FLE program evaluation research in real-world field conditions: (a) clarify upfront the underlying program theory of change or logic model and make research decisions based on this model; (b) adopt a developmental perspective on program evaluation and a mentality of continuous quality improvement; (c) when ready, invest in rigorous impact evaluations with random assignment; and (d) share and synthesize evaluation work to strengthen the field. A theme woven throughout these best practices is for program administrators to collaborate with experienced evaluation researchers to deal with challenging issues. Following these best-practice guidelines will help program administrators overcome common barriers and conduct evaluation work that strengthens their programs over time and enriches the lives of families.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hawkins, A. J., Clyde, T. L., Doty, J. L., & Avellar, S. (2020, July 1). Best Practices in Family Life Education Program Evaluation. Family Relations. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12420

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free