Heparin-coated vs. Non-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: Comparing immediate results with different target activated clotting time

10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare immediate postoperative results in patients receiving heparin-albumin-coated and non-coated circuits. Methods: A total of 241 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were divided into two groups: those receiving heparin-coated circuits (Bioline®, Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany) and those receiving non-coated circuits (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany). Results: Activated clotting times (ACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were significantly shorter in the heparin-albumin-coated group than in the non-coated group (355.64±34.12 vs. 560.38±90.20, respectively, P=0.001). In-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rates and lengths of intensive care unit stay were similar between the groups; in contrast, in the heparin-albumin-coated group, patients had significantly better outcomes for hospital stay, drainage, and need for erythrocyte transfusion. Conclusion: Heparin-coated circuits and reduced level of systemic heparinization with 300 seconds of target ACT level in cardiac surgery under CPB are safe and result in a very satisfactory clinical course.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hanedan, M. O., Yürük, M. A., Arslan, A. K., Kılıç, A., Sayar, U., & Mataracı, İ. (2020). Heparin-coated vs. Non-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: Comparing immediate results with different target activated clotting time. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 35(6), 913–917. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free