Abstract
Objective: To compare immediate postoperative results in patients receiving heparin-albumin-coated and non-coated circuits. Methods: A total of 241 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were divided into two groups: those receiving heparin-coated circuits (Bioline®, Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany) and those receiving non-coated circuits (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG., Hirrlingen, Germany). Results: Activated clotting times (ACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were significantly shorter in the heparin-albumin-coated group than in the non-coated group (355.64±34.12 vs. 560.38±90.20, respectively, P=0.001). In-hospital mortality and postoperative stroke rates and lengths of intensive care unit stay were similar between the groups; in contrast, in the heparin-albumin-coated group, patients had significantly better outcomes for hospital stay, drainage, and need for erythrocyte transfusion. Conclusion: Heparin-coated circuits and reduced level of systemic heparinization with 300 seconds of target ACT level in cardiac surgery under CPB are safe and result in a very satisfactory clinical course.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hanedan, M. O., Yürük, M. A., Arslan, A. K., Kılıç, A., Sayar, U., & Mataracı, İ. (2020). Heparin-coated vs. Non-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: Comparing immediate results with different target activated clotting time. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 35(6), 913–917. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0387
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.