Role of locoregional treatment in vulvar cancer with pelvic lymph nodemetastases: Time to reconsider FIGO staging?

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Vulvar cancer with pelvic nodal involvement is considered metastatic (M1) disease per AJCC staging. The role of definitive therapy and its resulting impact on survival have not been defined. Patients and Methods: Patients with pelvic lymph node-positive vulvar cancer diagnosed in 2009 through 2015 were evaluated from the National Cancer Database. Patients with known distant metastatic disease were excluded. Logistic regression was used to evaluate use of surgery and radiation therapy (RT).Overall survival (OS)was evaluated with logrank test and Cox proportional hazards modeling (multivariate analysis [MVA]). A 2-month conditional landmark analysis was performed. Results: A total of 1,304 women met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 38 months for survivors. Chemotherapy, RT, and surgery were used in 54%, 74%, and 62% of patients, respectively. Surgery was associated with prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shinde, A., Li, R., Amini, A., Chen, Y. J., Cristea, M., Wang, W., … Glaser, S. (2019). Role of locoregional treatment in vulvar cancer with pelvic lymph nodemetastases: Time to reconsider FIGO staging? JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 17(8), 922–930. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.7288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free