Treatment of Uveal Melanoma With Radioactive Iodine 125 Implant Compared With Proton Beam Radiotherapy

14Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To review the current state of radiation therapy for uveal melanoma and compare particle radiation and brachytherapy. Patients and Methods: The medical records of 156 patients treated for uveal melanoma between May 30, 2012, and March 16, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Treatments consisted of either radioactive iodine 125 implant (RAI) or fractionated proton radiation (proton beam therapy [PBT]). Baseline characteristics were compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test or χ2 test. Outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models or logistic regression models. Results: The median length of follow-up after treatment was 2.7 years (range, 0.5 to 9.0 years). Patients who underwent treatment with RAI were older (median age, 67 vs 59 years; P.05). Patients who underwent RAI treatment had significantly higher risk of diplopia (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolling, J. P., Dagan, R., Rutenberg, M., Mamalui-Hunter, M., Buskirk, S. J., Heckman, M. G., … Slopsema, R. (2022). Treatment of Uveal Melanoma With Radioactive Iodine 125 Implant Compared With Proton Beam Radiotherapy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality and Outcomes, 6(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.10.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free