The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions

61Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Among many legal professionals and memory researchers there exists the assumption that susceptibility to false memory decreases with age. In 4 misinformation experiments, we show that under conditions that focus on the meaning of experiences, children are not always the most susceptible to suggestion-induced false memories. We begin by presenting a short overview of previous developmental false memory studies, the majority of which have found that the susceptibility to misinformation decreases with age. In Experiment 1, 6/7-year-olds, 11/12-year-olds, and adults received a video and were confronted with misinformation about related but nonpresented details. Older children and adults had higher misinformation acceptance rates than younger children. In Experiment 2, we replicated this finding adding a younger child group (4/6-year-olds). In Experiments 3 and 4, we used new material and again found that susceptibility to misinformation increased with age. Together, these experiments show that children's memory accuracy is not necessarily inferior to that of adults'.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Brackmann, N., & Smeets, T. (2016). The malleability of developmental trends in neutral and negative memory illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000127

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

80%

Researcher 4

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 44

85%

Social Sciences 4

8%

Computer Science 2

4%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free