Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with a class-1 guideline recommendation. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of ARNI versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) on all-cause and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality and hospitalizations in heart failure (HF) with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF). Methods: Patient-level clinical, laboratory, drug dispensation, hospitalization, and mortality data were derived from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) and interlinked databases (1 April 2016–31 December 2020). Eligible ARNI:ACEi/ARB patients (n = 7275:24,604) had a left ventricular EF < 50%. Mortality and hospitalizations with ARNI (≤ 3 months pre-/post-1 April 2016 index [SwedeHF]; n = 1506) versus ACEi/ARB (≤ 3 months post-index; n = 17,108) were assessed using propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) with clinical variables, and sensitivity analysis (1:2/1:3 with, and 1:2 without clinical variables). Results: ARNI induced a 23% reduction in all-cause mortality versus ACEi/ARB (1:1 hazard ratio [HR; 95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.77 [0.63–0.95], p = 0.013), and a non-significant 23% relative risk reduction in CV-related mortality (0.77 [0.54–1.09], p = 0.13), but no difference in all-cause or CV-related hospitalization (1.02 [0.91–1.13]; p = 0.76; 1.01 [0.91–1.15]; p = 0.84, respectively). Sensitivity analyses confirmed all-cause mortality was reduced for ARNI versus ACEi/ARB (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.82–0.99], p = 0.026), but not CV-related mortality (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.89–1.22], p = 0.63). Conclusions: In this nationwide real-world study including a population of patients with HF with reduced or mildly reduced EF, ARNI as part of guideline-led Swedish clinical practice was associated with a statistically significant relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with ACEi/ARB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fu, M., Pivodic, A., Käck, O., Costa-Scharplatz, M., Dahlström, U., & Lund, L. H. (2023). Real-world comparative effectiveness of ARNI versus ACEi/ARB in HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 112(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02124-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free