Response to comment on "Multiyear prediction of monthly mean atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5°N"

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Vecchi et al. question the skill of our initialized multiyear predictions of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), arguing that our predictions do not outperform their suggested climatological reference forecast-using a single measure of skill. We show that our initialized AMOC predictions do outperform the climatological reference forecast, using both measures of hindcast performance that were presented in our original paper.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matei, D., Baehr, J., Jungclaus, J. H., Haak, H., Müller, W. A., & Marotzke, J. (2012, November 2). Response to comment on “Multiyear prediction of monthly mean atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5°N.” Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free