Pretreatment with anticatabolic agents blunts but does not eliminate the skeletal anabolic response to parathyroid hormone in oophorectomized mice

39Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that bisphosphonate pretreatment can inhibit the anabolic actions of PTH. We examined the capacity of two anticatabolic agents with different mechanisms of action, alendronate and osteoprotegerin (OPG), to influence the anabolic activity of PTH. Oophorectomized mice were pretreated for 30 d with alendronate or OPG and then treated for 30 d with the respective anticatabolic alone or the respective anticatabolic plus PTH(1-34). Bones were analyzed by bone mineral density (BMD), microcomputed tomography, histology and histomorphometry, and biochemical bone markers. OPG pretreatment produced a greater inhibition of bone turnover and a greater increase in bone than alendronate. Increases in bone were sustained during subsequent treatment with vehicle or continued administration of the anticatabolic. Pretreatment with each anticatabolic blunted the capacity of PTH to increase BMD and bone volume and continued treatment with each anticatabolic agent also reduced the effectiveness of PTH. Although both anticatabolics decreased the maximal PTH effect, BMD and bone volume increased more when PTH was added than when only anticatabolics were used. These results demonstrate that mechanistically distinct anticatabolics may reduce PTH efficacy, that the characteristics of this inhibition may reflect the different modes of action of the anticatabolics, but that the addition of PTH still provides a skeletal benefit even if the anabolic effect is submaximal. Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samadfam, R., Xia, Q., & Goltzman, D. (2007). Pretreatment with anticatabolic agents blunts but does not eliminate the skeletal anabolic response to parathyroid hormone in oophorectomized mice. Endocrinology, 148(6), 2778–2787. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-1475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free