A cross-sectional comparison of physical activity during covid-19 in a sample of rural and non-rural participants in the US

15Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) pre-COVID-19 was lower in rural areas compared to non-rural areas. The purpose of this study was to determine COVID-19’s impact on PA in rural and non-rural residents. A cross-sectional study consisting of a convenience sample of 278 participants (50% rural, 50% nonrural) from 25 states completed an online survey describing their PA behaviors and perceptions during COVID-19. The global physical activity questionnaire was used to determine PA in various domains and summed to determine if the participant met the PA guidelines. Rural participants had a significantly higher body mass index, lower income, and a lower educational attainment. Conversely, non-rural participants reported more barriers to PA. There was no difference in the perception of COVID-19’s impact on PA, specifically; however, rural participants were significantly less likely to meet cardiorespiratory PA recommendations compared to non-rural participants. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the continued disparity in PA between rural and non-rural residents, despite the supposition of COVID-19 being less impactful in rural areas due to sparse populations. Efforts should be pursued to close the PA gap between rural and non-rural residents.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beck, A. M., Gilbert, A. S., Duncan, D. D., & Wiedenman, E. M. (2021). A cross-sectional comparison of physical activity during covid-19 in a sample of rural and non-rural participants in the US. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free