The role of antibody testing for sars-cov-2: Is there one?

242Citations
Citations of this article
446Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) brought with it rapid development of both molecular and serologic assays for identification of COVID-19 infections. While Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA) is required for clinical application of SARSCoV-2 molecular tests, submission for EUA is currently a voluntary process for manufacturers of serologic assays. The absence of FDA oversight of serologic tests is concerning given that the commercially available serologic assays are highly variable, differing in their format, the antibody class detected, the targeted antigen, and the acceptable specimen types. An added complication is the lack of a clear understanding for how such assays should be utilized and what the reported results ultimately indicate or, perhaps more importantly, what they do not indicate. Here, we provide a brief summary of the performance of a number of serologic assays reported in the literature, comment on what we do and do not know regarding our immune response to SARS-CoV-2, and provide a number of scenarios for which serologic testing will play a role during our global response to this pandemic.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Theel, E. S., Slev, P., Wheeler, S., Couturier, M. R., Wong, S. J., & Kadkhoda, K. (2020, August 1). The role of antibody testing for sars-cov-2: Is there one? Journal of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00797-20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free