Branding the role and value of intercollegiate athletics

10Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, I critically examine Myles Brands criticisms of what he calls the Standard View of the role and value of intercollegiate athletics. According to Brand, the Standard View, held by most faculty members, undervalues college sports and should be replaced by the Integrated View that properly stresses the educational value of participating in athletics. I claim that Brands analogical argument has a variety of problems. I show that Brands conclusion, derived from his attempt to compare the experiences of student-musicians and student-athletes is unpersuasive, yet his argument forces us to confront persistent and important questions about liberal arts education and the role and value of the arts, especially music, in higher education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feezell, R. (2015, May 4). Branding the role and value of intercollegiate athletics. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2014.911098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free