Abstract
This paper summarizes assumptions made and results obtained in parts of the literature on welfare and sustainability accounting. I consider five different assumptions that can be imposed independently of each other, producing 32 different combinations. This taxonomy is used to organize results in welfare and sustainability accounting. The analysis illustrates how stronger results require stronger assumptions and thereby imposed harder informational requirements.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Asheim, G. B. (2003). Green national accounting for welfare and sustainability: A taxonomy of assumptions and results. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 50(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9485.5002001
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.