On a closed-form doubly robust estimator of the adjusted odds ratio for a binary exposure

13Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies often aim to estimate the odds ratio for the association between a binary exposure and a binary disease outcome. Because confounding bias is of serious concern in observational studies, investigators typically estimate the adjusted odds ratio in a multivariate logistic regression which conditions on a large number of potential confounders. It is well known that modeling error in specification of the confounders can lead to substantial bias in the adjusted odds ratio for exposure. As a remedy, Tchetgen Tchetgen et al. (Biometrika. 2010;97(1):171-180) recently developed so-called doubly robust estimators of an adjusted odds ratio by carefully combining standard logistic regression with reverse regression analysis, in which exposure is the dependent variable and both the outcome and the confounders are the independent variables. Double robustness implies that only one of the 2 modeling strategies needs to be correct in order to make valid inferences about the odds ratio parameter. In this paper, I aim to introduce this recent methodology into the epidemiologic literature by presenting a simple closed-form doubly robust estimator of the adjusted odds ratio for a binary exposure. A SAS macro (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina) is given in an online appendix to facilitate use of the approach in routine epidemiologic practice, and a simulated data example is also provided for the purpose of illustration. © 2013 © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J. (2013). On a closed-form doubly robust estimator of the adjusted odds ratio for a binary exposure. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(11), 1314–1316. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws377

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free