Abstract
The detection of an abdominal mass represents a common finding in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to retrospectively describe the tissue distribution and diagnosis of abdominal masses amenable to surgical removal in a canine population. Dogs with abdominal masses with a minimum diameter of 3 cm were selected. Cases were classified, based on the anatomical location, as splenic, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, genital, and masses not associated with any organ. Masses were surgically removed and formalin-fixed for the histological examination. Collected data were statistically analyzed. A total of 123 masses were collected from 122 dogs. Sixty-nine masses were classified as malignant neoplasia, 15 as benign, and 39 as non-neoplastic. The abdominal masses were 5.8-fold more likely to be malignant if located in the gastrointestinal tract (p = 0.01). A significant association between the size and the site of the masses was identified, the masses not associated with any organ being larger than the genital and splenic lesions (p = 0.008). This case series describes the most frequent location in association with the histopathological diagnosis of canine abdominal masses and suggests that the gastrointestinal location was related to a higher risk of representing a malignant neoplasm.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Valenti, P., Pellegrino, V., Muscatello, L. V., Brunetti, B., Zambon, E., Gerboni, G. M., … Avallone, G. (2021). The site of origin of canine abdominal masses correlates with the risk of malignancy: Retrospective study of 123 cases. Animals, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040962
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.