Experimental performance comparison of R1234yf and R134a automobile air conditioning systems employing a variable capacity compressor

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The use of refrigerants from the hydrofluorocarbon family has been restricted due to their high global warming potential, and the manufacturers have been using R1234yf recently, a refrigerant from the hydrofluoroolefin family, as a substitute for R134a in mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems. In this study, a laboratory MAC system with a variable-capacity compressor was set up, and its comparative energetic and exergetic performance was evaluated for the cases of using R1234yf and R134a by changing the test conditions in a wide range. The results revealed that the system with R1234yf provided on average 13.7% less cooling duty and 12.8% less coefficient of performance based on the total power input relative to the system with R134a. Furthermore, the system with R1234yf destructed on average 18.9% more exergy per unit cooling duty. Excluding the condenser, the components of the R1234yf system destructed more exergy per unit cooling duty than those of the R134a one.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tasdemirci, E., Alptekin, E., & Hosoz, M. (2023). Experimental performance comparison of R1234yf and R134a automobile air conditioning systems employing a variable capacity compressor. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 90(1–4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2022.129169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free