Implementation of the Walrasian correspondence: The boundary problem

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Consider exchange economies in which preferences are continuous, convex and strongly monotonic. It is well known that the Walrasian correspondence is not Nash implementable: Maskin monotonicity (Maskin in Rev Econ Stud 66:23-38, 1999) is violated for Walrasian allocations on the boundary of the feasible set. We derive an impossibility result showing that the Walrasian correspondence is in fact not implementable in any of the solution concepts considered in the implementation literature. Next, imposing an additional domain restriction, we construct a sequential mechanism that doubly implements the Walrasian correspondence in subgame perfect and strong subgame perfect equilibrium. The mechanism is based on price-allocation announcements, and it fits the very description of Walrasian equilibrium. We thus take care of the boundary problem that was prominent in the Nash implementation literature. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bochet, O. (2007). Implementation of the Walrasian correspondence: The boundary problem. International Journal of Game Theory, 36(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-007-0103-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free