Comparing cadaveric and 3D-printed laryngeal models in transcutaneous injection laryngoplasty

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is increasing focus on the development of high-quality simulation models for medical education. Cadaveric models, although considered more realistic, may be difficult to obtain and costly. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has offered a low-cost, reliable, and reproducible alternative. This study sought to compare the utility of 3D-printed to cadaveric models for training in transcutaneous injection laryngoplasty (TIL). Methods: A simulation course with a cross-over design was employed. Video laryngoscopes were utilized for both the 3D and cadaveric models to assess the accuracy of injection into the vocal fold. Pre-procedure and post-procedure surveys were administered to evaluate understanding and comfort level on a Likert scale of 1–10. Each model was also rated on a 1–5 Likert scale for self-efficacy, fidelity, and educational value. Results: Pre- and post-survey data were completed by 15 otolaryngology residents and medical students. Mean pre-seminar understanding and comfort level were 3.7 and 2.2, respectively, compared to 6.9 and 5.9 (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandna, M., Siddiqui, S., Bertoni, D., Sakkal, M., Belko, S., Boon, M., & Spiegel, J. (2024). Comparing cadaveric and 3D-printed laryngeal models in transcutaneous injection laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free