EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF NAMING BEHAVIOR CANNOT EXPLAIN NAMING CAPACITY

  • Harnad S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An explanation like this is impossible from just the experimental analysis of behavior: one must also hypothesize and then analyze the internal structures and processes that generate the capacity to exhibit the behavior (Harnad 1982, 1984). It is only from such research that we will come to understand the origins of naming and symbolic behavior (Harnad 1995b). -- An internal representational analysis of the honest-toil vs. symbolic-theft distinction might even cast some explanatory light on Skinner's named but unexplicated distinction between contingency-based and ruled-governed behavior (Skinner 1984b).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harnad, S. (1996). EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF NAMING BEHAVIOR CANNOT EXPLAIN NAMING CAPACITY. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-262

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free