Media coverage of pedophilia: Benefits and risks from healthcare practitioners’ point of view

23Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The fierce stigma associated with pedophilia may interfere with attempts to prevent sexual offending. Prior research on the effects of media reports about pedophilia mostly focused on their role in perpetuating stigma in the general population. In order to better understand potential benefits and risks of the media coverage on people with pedophilia and specialized prevention and treatment efforts, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 11 healthcare practitioners of the German Prevention Network “Don’t offend”. Healthcare practitioners described positive (e.g., raising awareness for prevention offers) as well as negative (e.g., perpetuating the existing public stigma) effects of the media coverage and estimated that only about one-third of media coverage portrays pedophilia realistically. To destigmatize pedophilia and benefit the prevention of child sexual abuse, a fact box for journalists was developed based on practitioners’ expert knowledge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stelzmann, D., Jahnke, S., & Kuhle, L. F. (2020). Media coverage of pedophilia: Benefits and risks from healthcare practitioners’ point of view. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free