Safety of coronary revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave--free ratio in patients with chronic kidney disease

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The safety of revascularization deferral according to pressure wire examination in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been fully established. Methods: From a retrospective cohort of 439 patients in whom revascularization was deferred after physiological assessment, we examined the incidence of patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI] and unplanned revascularization) in patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and without it. Results: At 4 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint was met by 25.0% of patients with CKD and by 14.4% of patients without CKD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–2.53, p = 0.071). The incidence of POCE was even higher in patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2: 43.8% (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.08–8.92, p = 0.036). However, no differences were observed in the incidence of MI (4.2% vs. 4.4% in non-CKD), target vessel revascularization (5.8% vs. 5.9%), and target vessel MI (0.8% vs. 4.6%). Conclusions: Patients with CKD in whom pressure-wire evaluation led to deferral of coronary re-vascularization develop more POCE in the long term, compared to patients with normal renal func-tion. However, the increase in POCE in patients with CKD was seldom related to deferred vessels, thus suggesting an epiphenomenon of an intrinsically higher cardiovascular risk of CKD patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Travieso, A., Castro-Mejía, A. F., Jerónimo-Baza, A., Pérez-Vizcayno, M. J., Mejía-Rentería, H., Macaya, F., … Gonzalo, N. (2022). Safety of coronary revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave--free ratio in patients with chronic kidney disease. Cardiology Journal, 29(4), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free