Forest Governance: Hydra or Chloris?

  • Arts B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract: Many forest-related problems are considered relevant today. One might think of deforestation, illegal logging and biodiversity loss. Yet, many governance initiatives have been initiated to work on their solutions. This Element takes stock of these issues and initiatives by analysing different forest governance modes, shifts and norms, and by studying five cases (forest sector governance, forest legality, forest certification, forest conservation, participatory forest management). Special focus is on performance: are the many forest governance initiatives able to change established practices of forest decline (Chloris worldview) or are they doomed to fail (Hydra worldview)? The answer will be both, depending on geographies and local conditions. The analyses are guided by discursive institutionalism and philosophical pragmatism. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arts, B. (2021). Forest Governance: Hydra or Chloris? Forest Governance: <I>Hydra</I> or <I>Chloris</I>? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108863551

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free